| 2,562 | 28 | 82 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
希腊等欧元区国家的主权债务危机可以说是欧洲区域一体化建设中的独特现象,其折射的是欧元区所存在的一个结构性问题:奉行单一货币政策和各国分散的财政政策,集中暴露出了欧洲货币一体化与欧洲福利资本主义的不相容、以及统一货币运行所要求的财政紧缩与欧元成员国经济增长和福利制度之间的矛盾与冲突;欧元不会就此瓦解,但欧债问题的最终解决困难重重;欧元的未来取决于自由与市场的回归欧洲,取决于欧盟的制度完善与欧式福利资本主义改革的成功与否。
Abstract:Sovereign-debt crises in Greece and the other Eurozone countries, which reflects the structural problems of Eurozone, is an unique phenomenon in Europe integration. The crises has exposed the problems rising from pursuing the single monetary policy and decentralized fiscal policy of individual countries. There are incompatibilities between the European monetary integration and European welfare capitalism, and conflicts between the fiscal austerity required in the single monetary policy and economic growth in the euro member states and their welfare systems. The euro will not collapse as a consequence. However, it will be difficult to ultimately solve the European debt problem. Euro’ s future depends on the freedom and market return to Europe; it also depends on the EU’s improvement of institution and reform of the welfare systems.
①以上数字均来源于历年的欧盟统计年鉴及欧盟统计局的相关数据。欧盟统计局的网址为:http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/eurostat/home.
②某种程度上作为对统合主义(Corporatism)的一种批评,自1970年代出现的新右派对民主政治提出了相当的批判,认为民主政治日益有一种“民主超载”(democratic overload)的危机,因为无法抵抗团体与选举的压力,导致政治体系的瘫痪。在新右派看来,统合主义的危机来自于赋予部门和经济利益团体相当多的权力,并对国家提出增加拨款、公共投资以及国家保护等要求,而这不可避免地造成了国家干预和经济停滞。另外,新右派的观点也认为选举过程也会造成政府超载。选举所建构的政治是一段自我挫败的过程,因为政客总是被鼓励增加对选民提出不切实际的承诺来竞争权力,为了权力的欲望,政客总是企图以更慷慨的公共支出保证来打击其竞争者。而根据新右派理论家伯利坦(S.Brittan)的看法,这种无节制的民主的经济后果就是政府举债所造成的高通货膨胀,以及拖跨企业和削弱成长的赋税重担。因此,新右派理论家倾向从严格的保护层面来看待民主,认为民主在本质上是防范政府专断,而不是充当社会转型的工具。具体可参看:S.Brittan,The Economic Contradictions of Democracy[J].British Journal of Political Science,1975,5:129-159.
[1]Krugman,P.The Euro trap[N].The New York Times,2010-04-29.
[2]Marsh,D.(2009).The Euro:The politics of the new global currency[M].Yale University Press.
[3]Krugman,P.The making of a Euromess[N].The New York Times,2010-02-14.
[4]Attali,J.(2010).Greek crisis is midwife to completion of the European project[J].New Perspectives Quarterly,27(3/4):65-66.
[5]鲁茉莉.论欧元与福利资本主义的非相容性[J].国际观察,2005(5).
基本信息:
中图分类号:F835
引用信息:
[1]施爱国,崔正男.欧债危机成因与前景的制度分析[J].战略决策研究,2010,1(04):40-45.
2010-09-10
2010-09-10